Canada Global Tv

Tag: Supreme court

  • Britain Should Also Rectify Its Mistakes, The Supreme Court Wrote A Letter To The High Commissioner

    Britain Should Also Rectify Its Mistakes, The Supreme Court Wrote A Letter To The High Commissioner

    Canada Global(Web News)The letter said that the interest shown by the British government is welcome, it was necessary to hold elections in Pakistan within 90 days of the completion of the term of the National and Provincial Assemblies, the Supreme Court disposed of the matter in just 12 days.

    The Registrar Supreme Court said let us step back from the brink of settler ethnic supremacy, let us all stand up

    . What has happened and steps have been taken to ensure that they do not happen again.
    The Registrar Supreme Court said in the letter that since the government of King Charles III has emphasized the need for open societies and democracy and expressed its wish and good wishes for openness and democracy to the people of your country.

  • The Supreme Court Of Pakistan Will Hear The Government’s Appeals Against The Nab Amendments Today

    The Supreme Court Of Pakistan Will Hear The Government’s Appeals Against The Nab Amendments Today

    Canada Global(Web News) On the other hand, PTI founder Imran Khan filed a petition in the Supreme Court to appear in the Supreme Court in a personal capacity regarding the hearing of the NAB amendment case. .

    In the decision, the NAB’s amendments related to the definition of benami, assets in excess of income and shifting the burden of proof to the prosecution were nullified. The federal government has filed intra-court appeals against the decision.

  • A Reception Was Held In Honor Of Justice Mary Moreau Of The Supreme Court Of Canada

    A Reception Was Held In Honor Of Justice Mary Moreau Of The Supreme Court Of Canada

    Canada Global(Web News)Trust in Canada’s justice system depends on clear communication with the public, the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada officially welcomed a new female judge to the court on Monday.

    A reception was held on Monday for Justice Mary Moreau, who was sworn in as a Supreme Court judge in November.
    Her appointment means that for the first time in the history of the Supreme Court, the majority of nine judges are women.
    Moreau served as a lawyer for 14 years. In 1994, she was appointed a judge in the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta. She became Chief Justice of the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta in 1997.
    During his speech, Moreau described how an experience early in his career as a judge shaped his professional beliefs.
    Moreau said Canadians should be able to identify themselves in the justice system,
    adding that Canadian laws should respect human rights and be interpreted in a timely, open and accessible process.
  • Supreme Court, Tehreek-E-Insaaf Withdrew The Application Regarding The Bat Symbol

    Supreme Court, Tehreek-E-Insaaf Withdrew The Application Regarding The Bat Symbol

    Canada Global(Web News)Tehreek-e-Insaf has withdrawn its petition from the Supreme Court regarding the bat symbol. Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Justice Musrat Hilali wer

    At the beginning of the hearing, the Chief Justice of Pakistan asked Barrister Gohar, who are you, Hamid Khan, where is Mr. Barrister Gohar said that I am the lawyer of the petitioner.
    Justice Qazi said that Hamid Khan sir, you said a day before yesterday that you are a lawyer, Hamid Khan said that our case is currently in Peshawar High Court, Chief Justice said that you did not stand up, tell me that You are not a lawyer in this case Hamid Khan said no, I am not a lawyer in this case.

    The Chief Justice of Pakistan said that tomorrow someone should claim that we have not withdrawn the application at this time, where is Ali Zafar, he has no objection to withdrawing the application Hamid Khan said no, Ali Zafar has no objection, he Currently in Peshawar High Court.
    The Supreme Court rejected the petition on the basis of withdrawal of the petition by PTI and said that no lawyer of PTI objected to the withdrawal of the petition.
    Earlier speaking to the media outside the Supreme Court, Chairman PTI Barrister Gohar Ali Khan said that today our petition is pending in the Supreme Court but our main case is also pending in the Peshawar High Court. An order will come from the High Court, so we have withdrawn our petition from the Supreme Court.

    Gohar Ali Khan said that the decision of Peshawar High Court will be in our favor.
    It should be noted that Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf has approached the Supreme Court against the decision of the Peshawar High Court.

  • Why Shah Mehmood Could Not Be Released Despite Bail?

    Why Shah Mehmood Could Not Be Released Despite Bail?

    Canada Global(Web News) PTI leader Shah Mehmood Qureshi could not be released despite being granted bail by the Supreme Court in the cipher case.

    According to the details, the documents could not be collected due to the delay in getting certified copies from the Supreme Court and the request of the special court judge in the jail.
    The arrest of Shah Mahmood Qureshi is likely to take place on Tuesday after the completion of the rules and regulations.

    It should be remembered that the Supreme Court approved the bail of Imran Khan and Shah Mehmood in the cipher case yesterday, after which the leaders of the PML-N held a press conference and expressed their reservations and expressed strong reactions. Two more are arrested in cases due to which their bail is currently not possible while Shah Mehmood is likely to be released on Tuesday.

  • What Options Does Pti Have Now, Experts Informed

    What Options Does Pti Have Now, Experts Informed

    Canada Global(Web News)On Election Commission’s decision to declare PTI’s intra-party election null and void, experts say that only the electoral symbol has been withdrawn, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf will remain as a party.

    Legal expert Hafiz Ehsan Ahmad said that the five parts of the Election Act are very important. It is the responsibility of every political party to conduct elections within the party. The Election Commission did not issue the certificate after the intra-party elections.
    Hafiz Ehsan Ahmed said that according to the Election Act, the party which does not follow the rules will not get the election symbol
    . The last date for the allotment of election marks is till January 13. Election marks can be taken by going to the Supreme Court.

    Former Secretary Election Commission Kanwar Dilshad said that the Election Commission has decided under Section 209 that this is the authority of the Election Commission. There is scope to appeal against the decision, all intra-party elections of PTI were challenged while the intra-party elections of other parties were not challenged.
    Kanwar Dilshad further said that only the electoral symbol has been withdrawn under this decision, Tehreek-e-Insaf will remain as a party, if the Supreme Court also decides against it, then the party members can contest the election as independent candidates. are.

  • I Will Fight The Action Of The Supreme Judicial Council Till The End, Justice Mazahar Naqvi’s Letter

    I Will Fight The Action Of The Supreme Judicial Council Till The End, Justice Mazahar Naqvi’s Letter

    Canada Global(Web News) Supreme Court judge Justice Mazahir Akbar Naqvi has written an open letter to the Chief Justice and Supreme Court judges against the proceedings in the Supreme Judicial Council.

    In his letter, Justice Mazahar Akbar Naqvi wrote that Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa and Justice Sardar Tariq Masood wrote letters to the former Chief Justice to take action against me. I am not performing duties for anyone except the Supreme Court and the people of Pakistan. . .

    In the letter, the Supreme Court judge said, “I am suffering the consequences of refusing to play into the hands of Pakistan’s political elite and will fight the action of the Supreme Judicial Council till the end.” This is not about me but about the dignity of the Supreme Court.

    He wrote that the letter written by the registrar of Justice Ejazul Ahsan to the Supreme Court shows how the law of practice and procedure is being violated and the three-member committee meeting on the basis of seniority to form benches. has been decided.

    Justice Mazahir Naqvi questioned in the letter that why Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa constituted a bench on this occasion, let the judges decide by themselves.

  • America Wants Free And Fair Elections In Pakistan

    America Wants Free And Fair Elections In Pakistan

    Canada Global(Web News)The United States has once again supported free and fair elections in Pakistan. The spokesperson of the US Department of State said that the attention of the United States is focused on free and fair elections in Pakistan.

    During the press briefing, US State Department spokesperson Vedant Patel said that the decision of the candidate and political party representation should be decided by the people of Pakistan, to ensure that the elections in Pakistan are in the interest of the people. .

    It should be remembered that the date of February 8 was announced for the election in Pakistan and after this announcement all the political parties have started their election campaign slowly.

    The election was announced by the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court also made it clear that all the parties

    Agreed, now history is a line on the stone.

  • Imran Khan Filed A Bail Application In The Supreme Court

    Imran Khan Filed A Bail Application In The Supreme Court

    Canada Global(Web News)  Chairman Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf filed a bail application in the Supreme Court in the cipher case. Naseem Khokhar and the federal government have been made parties in the application on behalf of the former prime minister.

    Chairman Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf has taken a position in the petition that the cipher case is a link of political cases against the former prime minister, the trial court has failed to understand this.
    The former Prime Minister has further stated in the application that the bail application has been filed under Article 185 of the Constitution, the malfeasance of the FIA ​​under the Ministry of Home Affairs is clearly evident in this case, in the cipher and foreign funding cases. IA’s malice is clear.
    In the petition on behalf of Chairman PTI, the Supreme Court has been requested to release the accused in the case on bail.

  • Justice Irfan Saadat Took Oath As A Judge Of The Supreme Court

    Justice Irfan Saadat Took Oath As A Judge Of The Supreme Court

     Canada Global(Web News)Justice Irfan Saadat took oath as a judge of the Supreme Court. Justice Irfan Saadat’s swearing-in ceremony was held in the Supreme Court. Took an oath.

    All Supreme Court judges, attorney general and lawyers participated in the swearing in ceremony.

    It should be noted that Justice Irfan Saadat was the Chief Justice of Sindh High Court, after the appointment of Justice Irfan Saadat, the number of judges in the Supreme Court has increased to 16.

    It should be remembered that Acting Chief Justice of Sindh High Court Irfan Saadat was nominated as a judge of the Supreme Court.

  • Pti’s Decision To Tie Up With Political Parties For A Level Playing Field In The Election

    Pti’s Decision To Tie Up With Political Parties For A Level Playing Field In The Election

    Canada Global(Web News)Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf has finalized its strategy to achieve transparent elections and level playing field, the party has decided to start communication with other political parties next week. According to the report, in a statement, it has been said that a meeting of the sub-political committee of the core committee of PTI was held yesterday, in which various issues including the political situation and the party’s strategy were considered, but the statement did not come out.

    The Sub-Political Committee endorsed the demand of the People’s Party, which emphasized the involvement of the PTI in the electoral process for equal campaigning opportunities and transparent elections.
    The political committee examined the statements of various political parties regarding PTI’s involvement in the election process and level playing field.
    The participants of the meeting said that this statement of the leader of the People’s Party reflects the correct political thinking that the results of the elections will not be considered acceptable without the involvement of Tehreek-e-Insaaf.
    The committee called the demand of different political parties of the country to provide equal opportunities for free, fair, impartial and transparent elections to all political parties as a positive trend.
    The statement said that among all federal units, PTI is the largest and most popular political force in the country, therefore no political party, including PTI, was ‘artificially and unnaturally selected under the London Agreement’. could go Attempts to oust through an unconstitutional and undemocratic plan will have very disastrous consequences for democracy.
    The meeting demanded the PTI to release its election symbol ‘without delay’ and said it was necessary for the credibility and transparency of the elections.

    It was emphasized in the meeting that Tehreek-e-Insaf would welcome every positive role to ensure the conduct of free, fair, transparent and prompt elections.
    In the meeting, the political committee also discussed in detail the schedule of contacts with other political parties starting next week.
    Meanwhile, a PTI spokesperson condemned the crackdown on the party’s social media workers, saying state authorities have imposed strict restrictions on the media and press, criminalizing criticism and dissent.
    The PTI spokesperson demanded the Supreme Court to protect the fundamental rights of the citizens and to immediately address the state’s attack on the educated youth.
    The PTI spokesperson said that there is practically martial law in Pakistan and no consideration is being given to the constitution, law, ethics and social values.

  • Pakistan. Supreme Court declared the trial of civilians in military courts as illegal

    Pakistan. Supreme Court declared the trial of civilians in military courts as illegal

    Canada Global(Web news)The Supreme Court declared the trial of civilians in military courts as illegal and ordered all the accused of May 9 to be tried in ordinary courts.

    According to Express News, the Supreme Court today heard the petitions of the civilians against the trial in the military courts, in which the court reserved the decision and pronounced it some time ago.

    The verdict was delivered by a five-member larger bench headed by Justice Ijazul Ahsan, which included Justice Mazahir Naqvi, Justice Ayesha Malik, Justice Muneeb Akhtar and Justice Yahya Afridi. The Supreme Court delivered the decision by a four-to-one majority, allowing petitions against the trial of civilians in military courts.

    In its decision, the court declared Section Two-D-One of the Military Act unconstitutional and ordered all the accused to be tried by ordinary courts. The court decided that depending on the nature of the crime of the accused, the cases should be tried in ordinary courts. The court also declared Section 59(4) of the Official Secrets Act unconstitutional.

    The court dismissed 9 miscellaneous petitions on grounds of withdrawal. A 5-member larger bench headed by Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan heard the case. Justice Muneeb Akhtar, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Mazahir Naqvi and Justice Ayesha Malik were included in the bench.

    Jawad S. Khawaja’s lawyer Ahmed Hussain appeared at the beginning of the hearing. He said that I would like to read the order of the previous hearing.

    The head of the bench, Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan, said that in the last hearing, the Attorney General was on the rostrum, so let the Attorney General finish his arguments first. Lawyer former Chief Justice Jawad Khawaja said that I want to read the order of August 3 in front of the court, on which Justice Ejazul Hasan said that we have read that order.

    Justice Ejaz-ul-Hassan, talking to the Attorney General, said that Mr. Attorney General, you should give the final arguments, then we will see how to proceed with the court proceedings.

    Lawyer Salman Akram Raja said that military courts have started the trial of civilians despite giving assurances in the court, to which Justice Ejaz-ul-Ahsan said that we are aware of this, we will listen to the Attorney General first

    The Attorney General argued that I will give a summary of the previous hearing and I will explain why constitutional amendment was not necessary for the present trial, I will also discuss Article 175, I will also read the paragraph of Liaquat Hussain case, 21 I will also give arguments in the light of the decision of the 1st Constitutional Amendment and I will also answer the question whether the status of the accused is obtained after the indictment.

    The Attorney General assured the court that the May 9 accused will be tried in military courts in the same manner as civil courts, evidence will be recorded and detailed reasons will also be written in the decision.

  • The Supreme Court’s Decision Against The Nab Amendments Was Challenged

    The Supreme Court’s Decision Against The Nab Amendments Was Challenged

    Canada Global(Web News)The Supreme Court’s decision against the NAB amendments was challenged, a review appeal was filed against the decision of the NAB amendments.

    Advocate Farooq H. Naik on behalf of Abdul Jabbar challenged the NAB decision.

    According to the petitioner, the Supreme Court gave a decision against the NAB amendments without hearing us, and after the NAB amendments, the accountability court sent a reference against me to the Anti-Corruption Court.

    In the petition against the NAB amendments, the violation of fundamental rights was not identified while the constitutional and legal requirements were not fulfilled in the petition against the NAB amendments.

    In the petition, it was requested that the Supreme Court should annul the September 15 decision against the NAB amendments

  • The Federal Government Will Challenge The Decision Of Nab Amendments , Attorney General

    The Federal Government Will Challenge The Decision Of Nab Amendments , Attorney General

    Canada Global(Web News) In the context of the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the Practice and Procedure Act 2023, the federal government intends to challenge the decision of the NAB amendments. Attorney General of Pakistan Mansoor Usman Awan said that the appeal will be filed early next week. is likely to be filed in

    Permission may also be sought from the Supreme Court to produce additional documents in support of the contention

    The Attorney General said that according to the brief order issued on October 11, all decisions of the Supreme Court under Article 184 (3), including the decision to amend the NAB Ordinance, are hearable.

    He clarified that accordingly the federal government will file an appeal against the September 15 decision.

    The appeal is necessary because the Full Court’s Oct. 11 5-10 decision in the Practice and Procedure case declared the law constitutional and dismissed all appeals against it.

    Also read this

    NAB amendments annulled, corruption cases against people appointed to public positions including Nawaz Sharif, Zardari Geelani reinstated

    However, in the short order, the majority of the judges also held that Section 5(1) of the Act relating to potential right of appeal was constitutional.

    The NAB amendments were decided to be rejected on September 15 while the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023 became an Act of Parliament on April 21, thereby allowing appeals to be filed.

    The counsel also highlighted that cases relating to the interpretation of constitutional provisions would be heard by a bench of at least five judges as per Section 4 of the Act.

    A three-member bench headed by the then Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Atta Bandial gave a verdict against the NAB amendments.

    During the hearing of the NAB amendment case, Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah in a note on August 18 also clarified that if the constitutionality of sections 3 and 4 is upheld by another bench, then the NAB case will be null and void. .

    After which lawyer Makhdoom Ali Khan requested the Supreme Court in his petition to adjourn the hearing of the case until the final decision on the Practices and Procedures Act or to constitute a full court to hear the NAB amendment case.

    The petition also said that PTI Chairman Imran Khan’s challenge to the NAB amendments in the Supreme Court is an attempt to bypass the legislative process as per the Constitution.

    If such an attempt is allowed, in future all political parties which do not have a majority in Parliament to approve or oppose a law, will be brought directly to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 184(3) of the Constitution. Will use the option. Its use will undermine the legislative process.

    source link

  • Reaction Of Important Political Figures And Parties To The Supreme Court Decision

    Reaction Of Important Political Figures And Parties To The Supreme Court Decision

    Canada Global(Web News)After the Full Court Bench of the Supreme Court rejected all the petitions against the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure case and declared the Act legal, the country’s leading political personalities have expressed their reactions.

    Muslim League (N) president and former prime minister Shehbaz Sharif has praised the decision of the Supreme Court and said that the clause related to the past decision will not have any effect on Nawaz Sharif

    He added that this decision democratizes the functioning of the Supreme Court and respects the Parliament.
    Apart from this, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf said without naming any party on the decision of the Supreme Court that only disappointment has come to those who have political hopes from the court.

    Also read this 

    Practice and Procedure Act upheld, applications dismissed

    PTI said without naming the leader of Muslim League (N) Nawaz Sharif that there is a possibility of decrease in platelets after the report of lifelong disability. Raja Pervez Ashraf has welcomed the decision of the Supreme Court
    . .
    People’s Party leader Raja Pervez Ashraf has also welcomed the decision of the Supreme Court. He said that Parliament legislates for public welfare.

    source link

  • Nawaz Sharif And Jahangir Tareen Will Not Benefit From The Decision, Legal Experts

    Nawaz Sharif And Jahangir Tareen Will Not Benefit From The Decision, Legal Experts

     Canada Global(Web News)Legal experts giving their opinion on the decision of the Supreme Court said that Nawaz Sharif and Jahangir Tareen will not benefit from the decision, they can go for review.

    Legal expert Raja Amir Abbas said that the decision is fundamentally very important, lawyers’ organizations were asking for the right to appeal, this decision will not benefit Nawaz Sharif, the decision will be applied to future decisions. A full court was constituted in the case

    Practice and Procedure Act upheld, applications dismissed

    Irfan Qadir said that giving the right to appeal is a very good decision, the right to appeal has been taken away from people before, Nawaz Sharif can go for review, the review time is 30 days, the review will be completed. The court, not me,
    Aman Yousafzai said that according to the verdict, Nawaz Sharif will not get the right to appeal, the common man got the right to appeal and review.

    source link

  • Imran Khan, wife skip NAB hearing in Al-Qadir Trust case

    Imran Khan, wife skip NAB hearing in Al-Qadir Trust case

    Canada Global (Web News) Imran Khan, the leader of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, declared on Thursday that while he was out on bail, he would not participate in a NAB inquiry.

    He referred to the accusations made against him as “absolutely false, frivolous, and concocted” in a letter to the deputy director of the NAB. He stated that he would not be accessible before his protected bail expired on May 22 since he was in the process of requesting and receiving bail in a number of other judicial issues.

    Imran Khan, the chairman of the PTI and a former prime minister, and his wife Bushra Bibi missed the Thursday hearing of the National Accountability Bureau on the Al-Qadir Trust case.

    The couple was expected to appear in person before the NAB Rawalpindi court with the necessary paperwork. The former prime minister had been called in for questioning by the anti-graft commission in connection with an inquiry into a £190 million settlement with the UK.

    According to sources, Mr. Khan’s legal team recommended him to submit a written response to the 20 questions requested about the corruption case, which also involves a property tycoon, rather than appearing before NAB in person.

    Imran Khan, the PTI chairman, and his wife Bushra received a summons from the NAB earlier today, asking them to join the probe into the Al-Qadir Trust issue at 10am. The summons was delivered to the Zaman Park residence by a two-person NAB squad.

  • IHC orders to release Shah Mahmood Qureshi

    IHC orders to release Shah Mahmood Qureshi

    Canada Global (Web News) Shah Mahmood Qureshi, the leader of the PTI and a former foreign minister, was ordered released on Thursday by the Islamabad High Court (IHC).

    After hearing the appeal contesting Mr. Qureshi’s arrest, Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb ruled that his arrest under the 3 MPO (Maintenance of Public Order) was unlawful.

    The judge announced that the PTI leader would be freed following the submission of an undertaking. The PTI leader would be consulted before the undertaking was submitted, according to Mr Qureshi’s solicitors’ statement to the court.

    The PTI leader was detained on May 11 in Islamabad as the government tightened its grip on the party in response to nationwide demonstrations against the detention of the former prime minister Imran Khan.

    During a raid at Gilgit-Baltistan House in Islamabad, police detained Mr. Qureshi.

  • Govt to file reference against CJP Bandial

    Govt to file reference against CJP Bandial

    Canada Global (Web News) The PDM administration has resolved to refer Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial, and it has also approved a proposal to create a special committee to investigate the matter.

    The Shazia Sobia Soomro motion was accepted by the house.

    The members of the parliamentary committee are Mohsin Shahnawaz, Khurshid Junejo, Salahuddin Ayubi, Shahnaz Baloch, and Salahuddin.

    The committee will take into account filing references regarding the misconduct of additional judges as well.

  • Supreme Court to hear Punjab election case on Thursday

    Supreme Court to hear Punjab election case on Thursday

    Canada Global (Web News) A three-member bench led by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial will hear the matter pertaining to the Punjab elections, the Supreme Court of Pakistan stated on Wednesday.

    Thursday at 11:30am is the scheduled time for the case.

    The Supreme Court registrar has made public the updated cause list. Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Munib Akhtar, and Justice Ijazul Ahsan make up the three-person bench.

    However, it should be emphasised that Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial will not hear any additional cases on Thursday because he is apparently ill. The cases set for hearing today (Wednesday) were all cancelled as a result of the bench’s abrupt delisting.

    Twelve significant cases were to be heard by the delisted bench. The list of cases for bench number two was also cancelled after bench number one’s delisting.

    The bench’s cause list, which included Justices Shahid Waheed and Sardar Tariq Masood, was also cancelled. Many people are eagerly expecting the resolution of the issue, thus it is anticipated that the hearing involving the Punjab elections would be noteworthy.